article mix造句

• As you probably noticed the current title of the article mixes US and British spelling-not good at all.
• Also, a consistent citation style is not used ( see WP : WIAFA, 2c ); the article mixes citation templates with the cite template family.
• This article mixes up Abdul-Salam Hanafi, a Taliban governor from the 1990s, with Abdul-Salam Baryalai, the current Taliban Qunduz shadow governor.
• :In addition, the article mixes and matches reputable scholars, such as Richardson, alongside tabloid journalism, opinion pieces, pulp magazines, yellow journalism ( example " Who Was Maharaj Ji?
• I'm still a bit unsure about the way the article mixes history and lake features, but in its current state, I think it works okay . talk ) 15 : 30, 26 June 2009 ( UTC)
• I took this to mean that, if an article mixes LDR and non-LDR, all references must be named, including the non-LDR, even in the case of a non-LDR ref that is used only once in the article.
• I don't think this is the place to discuss the content, suffice to say that it's an article on a fringe theory and the articles mixes both serious scholars and conspiracy theorists, so it's true it could and should be approved.
• *An WP : NBSP check is needed throughout, the article mixes citation and cite templates, and in one case " The Age " is cited as a periodical, in other as a webcite-- needs to be consisten, websites need accessdates, periodicals are in italics.
• :The article is seriously undercited, doesn't conform to WP : LAYOUT or WP : MEDMOS, doesn't use the highest quality sources specific to the subject area, doesn't cite PMIDs, has an External link farm, the lead is overly technical and not a compelling summary, the article mixes citation styles and uses weasle words.